Shattered Trust: Exploring the Paragard IUD Lawsuit

In women’s health and contraceptive choices, the Paragard IUD, once touted as a reliable and effective option, is now under scrutiny as a mounting wave of lawsuits against Teva Pharmaceuticals unveils a troubling narrative.

Women who had placed their trust in this long-term birth control device have faced unexpected and severe complications during its removal, leading to injuries that require surgery and additional medical intervention.

This article aims to delve deep into the Paragard IUD lawsuit with the aim of advocating for a safer and more reliable future in women’s healthcare.

Let’s get started!

What Is Paragard IUD?

Paragard IUD is a non-hormonal intrauterine device that has been widely used as a long-term contraceptive option for women. Unlike hormonal IUDs, Paragard utilizes a unique copper coil design to prevent pregnancy.

The Paragard IUD is designed to be inserted into the uterus by a healthcare professional and can provide protection against pregnancy for roughly 10 years. Its copper components work by creating an inhospitable environment for sperm, preventing fertilization from occurring. It is interesting to note that Paragard is the only brand of Copper IUD present in the United States.

Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveals that 10.4% of women in the age group of 15-49 are currently using intrauterine devices like Paragard as a means of contraception. Paragrad IUDs were first approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1984 based on data supplied by the manufacturers themselves. Since 2010, the FDA has received more than 1600 reports of their breakage.

Defects and Complications: What Can Happen If an IUD Breaks?

When a Paragard IUD breaks, it can lead to severe complications with significant implications for a woman’s well-being.

Uterine perforation, where the broken pieces of the device puncture the uterine wall, is one of the most concerning outcomes. Research suggests that uterine perforations during insertion are rare. The incidence of perforation cases diagnosed within five years following IUD installation was only 0.6% within a study cohort that tracked over 327,000 women under the age of 50.

However, it is important to note that the risk of uterine perforation increases during removal, especially if the IUD is embedded or if there are complications during the extraction process.

Migration of the broken fragments within the pelvic region is another potential complication. These fragments can move outside the uterus, leading to inflammation, infection, scarring, or adhesions. The exact prevalence of migration-related complications is not well-documented, but cases have been reported in the medical literature and legal claims.

In certain instances, the broken Paragard IUD may become embedded in the uterus, making removal challenging. The need for more invasive procedures, such as hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, to extract the embedded fragments further underscores the seriousness of the situation.

The Legal Battle: Seeking Compensation for Your Damages

As the number of reported injuries related to the use of the Paragard IUD continues to rise, a significant number of individuals have taken legal action against the manufacturers.

The Paragard Lawsuit is attracting nearly 50-60 new cases every month. As of May 15, 2023, a total of 1966 cases have been filed against the manufacturers for failing the warn the customers of the potential defects in their product, and the Bellwether trials are scheduled to begin in Georgia in March 2024.

If you have suffered injuries as a result of using the Paragard IUD, you may be eligible to file a Paragard Lawsuit and seek compensation for your damages. However, the process of seeking compensation in these lawsuits can be complex and challenging.

Here are key points to consider:

  1. Establishing Liability: To seek compensation, it is crucial to establish that Teva Pharmaceuticals, the designer and manufacturer of the Paragard IUD, is liable for the injuries caused. This involves demonstrating that the device’s design or manufacturing defects directly led to the fractures and subsequent damages.
  2. Gathering Evidence: Building a strong case requires collecting evidence to support your claims. This may include medical records, X-rays, expert opinions, testimonies from healthcare providers, and any other relevant documentation that proves the link between the IUD and your injuries.
  3. Legal Representation: Hiring an experienced attorney specializing in product liability or personal injury is highly recommended. They can guide you through the legal process, help gather evidence, negotiate with the defendant’s legal team, and advocate for your rights and interests.
  4. Compensation and Damages: If successful in your lawsuit, you may be eligible to receive compensation for various damages, including medical expenses, surgical costs, rehabilitation, pain and suffering, emotional distress, lost wages, and future medical needs.

TorHoerman law estimates that the Paragard settlement amount will vary between $10,000 to $400,000. However, these are simply estimations based on previous mass tort cases involving defective medical devices. The actual compensation awarded will be based on the severity of the injuries and their impact on your life.

Moving Forward: Ensuring Safer Birth Control Options

The Paragard IUD lawsuits have shed light on the importance of prioritizing women’s health and safety when it comes to birth control options. Moving forward, it is essential to take steps to ensure the development and availability of safer alternatives. Here are key considerations in this pursuit:

  1. Regulatory Reforms: The Paragard IUD lawsuits have highlighted the need for stricter regulations and oversight in the approval and monitoring of medical devices. Regulatory bodies should review and update their processes to ensure that birth control devices undergo rigorous testing for safety and efficacy before they are made available to the public.
  2. Enhanced Post-Market Surveillance: It is crucial to establish robust systems for monitoring the performance and safety of birth control devices after they are approved and on the market. Timely identification of potential risks or issues can lead to early intervention, preventing harm to users.
  3. Informed Consent and Patient Education: Healthcare providers have a responsibility to thoroughly educate patients about the potential risks and benefits of different birth control options. Informed consent should include a discussion of the device’s potential complications, allowing individuals to make well-informed decisions about their contraceptive choices.
  4. Research and Development Funding: Governments, private organizations, and research institutions should allocate adequate resources to support research and development efforts focused on improving the safety and effectiveness of birth control options. Funding should be directed towards innovative technologies and long-term studies to assess the real-world performance of these devices.

By implementing these measures, the aim is to ensure that women have access to a range of birth control options that are both effective and safe.


Through the legal battles and the pursuit of safer options, women’s voices are being heard, their experiences validated, and their rights upheld. By addressing the failures of the past, we can work towards a future where trust in birth control is restored, ensuring the well-being and autonomy of women everywhere.